Sidharth Rawat vs Yuvan Nandal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In assessing the impending tennis match through statistical analysis, the performance on second serve is critical. Over the past six months, Rawat has demonstrated a marginal advantage by securing 43.76% of points on his second serve, compared to Nandal's 42.81%. This statistic holds significant predictive value regarding match outcomes, indicating Rawat's slight edge in this matchup.

When examining return game efficiency, Rawat again shows superiority, having won 48.61% of points on his opponent's second serve, surpassing Nandal's corresponding figure of 48.09%. Additionally, statistics from first serve returns underline Rawat's slight edge at 26.95% compared to Nandal's 25.81%. Such data is essential for forecasting the likely favorite in this head-to-head encounter.

Looking into breakpoint scenarios, Nandal appears slightly more composed under pressure, with a breakpoint save rate of 56.42% against Rawat's 51.22%. However, Rawat counters this by converting 35.2% of breakpoint opportunities, showing consistency in capitalizing on critical moments, though Nandal exceeds slightly with a conversion rate of 40.19%.

Considering overall yearly performance, Rawat presents a more robust profile, having won 53.33% of matches played (24/21), in contrast to Nandal's 40% (18/27). This win-loss record provides a comprehensive overview favoring Rawat. Analyzing the preferred playing surface, both athletes perform best on hard courts, with Rawat achieving a 54% win ratio and Nandal trailing at 48%.

Both players have primarily competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events over the past year, with Rawat winning 58.54% of these matches (24/17), compared to Nandal's 40.91% (18/26). Contextualizing these figures within the event level they have been playing at suggests Rawat's experience gives him an edge.

Evaluating the caliber of opponents faced, Rawat has been up against players with an average rank of 415.04, slightly higher than Nandal's average opponent rank of 430.84. In scenarios extending to a deciding set, Nandal holds a slight upper hand with a 50% success rate compared to Rawat's 42% over the past year.

Ultimately, while both competitors are entirely capable, the statistical overview suggests that Rawat holds a slight advantage, making him the likely candidate for victory in the upcoming match. As always, minute differences in competition dynamics could alter outcomes, but Rawat's consistent performance metrics make him the favorite to win.